Comments on: Wireless Portable Videophone have a big CON. Why?

By: Loida Ortiz

Loida Ortiz — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:00:30 +0000

Loida Ortiz
XX XXXXXXXX XXX
XXXXX XX XXXXXXX
want help.hovrs.tv mvp August 8-9-08

By: Sam the Bright

Sam the Bright — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:27:04 +0000

HOVRS MVP or whatever you are, if that true that MVP have internet browser, it’s another good point that customer would like to use as if it’s second computer to surf.

But I afraid I have knowledge that there are rare Wi-Fi access required IE which is lame.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:12:20 +0000

Thanks for the information! I agreed.

I was assuming that it might be little early for those video portables for anyone to use WiFi this time basically due to the speed and other few reasons like what you explained.

I’m wondering about the LAN WiFi, too but soon enough I shall find out how it fares. If it works good enough, then it helps us more roam-free within the range, know me meant. lol

In next two years or so it would rather be readily for those to use.

At least it won’t be long for them to be finally be useful. Let’s see what happens.

By: MVP does have Internet Browser

MVP does have Internet Browser — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:28:37 +0000

Before making assumptions about HOVRS and their free and superior product MVP – call “help.hovrs.tv” and ask them questions. They will tell you that MVP does come with an Internet browser and you will be able to connect to thousands of WiFi connections all over the world through hotels, coffee shops, and so on…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:55:24 +0000

Viable… What could I say about Viable. I bought VPADs. I only used it for like two weeks then it died. I could not use it. I have been trying to get hold someone and get it replace or refund but not able to do it.

Glad you posted this blog. Thank you! We need to know the truth about the mobility videophones. I cant say if HOVRS or CSDVRS is better but I know, for sure, Viable’s VPAD sucks! Also Viable hires signers more than certified interpreters. Viable’s Anthony Mowl, he is an true bullshitting artist. Viable is full of shit, I use HOVRS for relay because they got certified interpreters available to us.

I am going to wait for G3 to come out. I am using VPAD as a paperweight right now.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:27:10 +0000

The original D-Link was actually orginally from Sorenson, BTW.

Viable used some sort of a video security system control panel and converted it into a VP.

MVP, I have no idea where it came from, but it is likely that HOVRS did not manufacture it.

VRS companies are not in the business of manufacturing VP’s…except for Sorenson who has been in the VP business long before anyone else….

By: Sam the Bright

Sam the Bright — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:27:18 +0000

Troy, you’re correct, that CSDVRS Z is actual from Creative’s. Same idea when the original Sorenson VP is from DLink’s.

By: Troy

Troy — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:11:20 +0000

3g is not cover in many cities. It will happen all over the cities and then all these wireless phone or vp will support with many features for 3G. I want Iphone but I can always wait becz there will be a better one than what they gave out at this time.

By: Troy

Troy — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:09:21 +0000

as I understand MVP does come with broswer. Will have to wait and see if it’s the fact. VPAD is JUNK! CSDVRS dont make or create this Z-VP. CSDVRS just bought these wireless vp from other company and use CSDVRS’s brand name.

By: Marvelous

Marvelous — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:13:21 +0000

Yes. shoot! I agreed with you! It’s totally MISLED.

We can’t wait iPhone version 3.0 with video chat! with 3G.